In recent articles, I have outlined the roles and responsibilities of non-profit boards and focused on the legal and ethical responsibilities of individual non-profit board members. Now, I want to spotlight one very important task non-profit board members must complete carefully and strategically: setting executive compensation.
A non-profit’s chief executive is often the heart, soul and public face of the organization. The chief executive is responsible for leading and coaching staff members; overseeing revenue-generating and fundraising activities; making final strategic decisions to ensure the organization’s mission is advanced; and countless other day-to-day tasks.
Clearly, the chief executive position is vitally important to the overall success of any non-profit organization. So, how do you put a dollar value on something so important? In today’s hyper-competitive environment, non-profit organizations across the country are struggling to answer that question.
As we discussed in my previous article, the board of directors has the responsibility of hiring and setting compensation for executive leadership.
Of course, every non-profit organization wants to hire their first choice for the executive director role–but many quickly learn they’ve only budgeted for their third, fourth, or fifth choice.
Before going through the process of selecting a new chief executive, non-profit boards must find out the “going rate” for that position. That means analyzing the salaries and benefits of comparable positions in private, public, and non-profit sectors and comparing those salaries to what the organization is prepared to offer. Having in-depth knowledge of the current marketplace will help your board set expectations and budget appropriately.
The board needs to find middle ground between compensation that attracts the top talent and cost-cutting strategies that help the organization fund its services. That means offering a salary range that the IRS calls, “reasonable and not excessive.”
The National Council of Nonprofits encourages non-profit boards to think carefully before finalizing a deal with a new executive leader and ask itself: “Are the assets of this non-profit being used prudently and to advance the mission?”
The IRS has rules and regulations that aim to prevent non-profit organizations from overpaying their executive staff. If the non-profit board knowingly overpays an executive a salary the organization can’t afford, the IRS sees that as “excess compensation.” Penalties range from hefty fines to an organization losing its tax-exempt status.
Hiring a chief executive is one of the most important decisions a non-profit board has to make, and it should be documented as such. Non-profit board members will be asked by donors, supporters, reporters and perhaps the IRS to explain their hire and justify their salary and benefits.
Guidestar recommends a three-step process to ensure the board complies with IRS regulations and board members remain unbiased:
Guidestar’s recommendations follow the IRS “rebuttable presumption of reasonableness” rules. In other words: The board is doing its due diligence and covering its bases while it makes a strategic, well-thought-out decision on executive compensation.